Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

ACEC SA PAC

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 5955 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$15,500.00
Client Filers
9
Payments
29
Activity Range
11/03/2022–03/11/2026
Largest Payment
$1,000.00
Graph: 9 connected filers · 29 payments · $15,500.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1RS&H Political Action Committee$3,000.00402/11/2026
2Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. PAC$2,000.00402/24/2026
3HDR, Inc. Employee Owners PAC$2,000.00403/11/2026
4Cobb Fendley PAC$2,000.00401/29/2026
5GarverUSA PAC$2,000.00401/27/2026
6Pape-Dawson Engineers Political Action Committee$1,500.00303/05/2026
7Halff Associates State PAC$1,000.00201/22/2026
8Raba-Kistner PAC, Inc.$1,000.00202/07/2024
9KCI Texas PAC$1,000.00202/07/2025

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
ACEC HOUSTON PAC
Vendor ID 5935
9 100.0% 30 30.0%
ROBERT NICHOLS FOR TEXAS SENATE
Vendor ID 266306
8 88.9% 137 5.8%
MARK JONES CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 203542
7 77.8% 23 28.0%
CHARLIE RILEY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58326
7 77.8% 36 18.4%
VINCENT MORALES CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 345318
7 77.8% 39 17.1%
ANDY MEYERS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 16900
7 77.8% 45 14.9%
Tom Ramsey Campaign
Vendor ID 329690
7 77.8% 51 13.2%
GRADY PRESTAGE CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 132610
7 77.8% 62 10.9%
ARMANDO MARTINEZ CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 20120
7 77.8% 156 4.4%
RODNEY ELLIS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 267559
7 77.8% 187 3.7%
JOSE MENENDEZ CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 169533
7 77.8% 222 3.1%
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
7 77.8% 289 2.4%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
03/11/2026HDR, Inc. Employee Owners PAC$500.00Direct Contribution
03/05/2026Pape-Dawson Engineers Political Action Committee$500.00Campaign Contribution
02/24/2026Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. PAC$500.00Contribution
02/11/2026RS&H Political Action Committee$500.00ACEC San Antonio/Local Advocacy Committee annual membership
01/29/2026Cobb Fendley PAC$500.00Membership to the ACEC San Antonio Local Advocacy Committee
01/27/2026GarverUSA PAC$500.00Contribution
01/22/2026Halff Associates State PAC$500.00Campaign Contribution
04/21/2025HDR, Inc. Employee Owners PAC$500.002025 Membership
02/27/2025Halff Associates State PAC$500.00Campaign Contribution
02/18/2025Cobb Fendley PAC$500.00Local Advocacy Committee
02/12/2025RS&H Political Action Committee$500.00Contribution to ACEC San Antonio PAC
02/11/2025Pape-Dawson Engineers Political Action Committee$500.00Contributions/Donations Made By Candidate/Officeholder/Political Committee
02/11/2025GarverUSA PAC$500.00Contribution
02/10/2025Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. PAC$500.00 Contribution
02/07/2025KCI Texas PAC$500.00Contribution to ACEC SA PAC
02/16/2024HDR, Inc. Employee Owners PAC$500.00Direct Contribution
02/07/2024Raba-Kistner PAC, Inc.$500.00ACEC SA PAC, P.O. Box 6323, San Antonio, Texas 78209
02/06/2024RS&H Political Action Committee$1,000.00Contribution to ACEC San Antonio PAC
01/17/2024RS&H Political Action Committee$1,000.00Contribution to ACEC-SA PAC
01/10/2024Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. PAC$500.00 Contribution
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.