Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
A T T
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 3540 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$8,398.36
Client Filers
2
Payments
66
Activity Range
10/11/2007–06/25/2011
Largest Payment
$998.14
Graph: 2 connected filers · 66 payments · $8,398.36 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- A T T
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LEONARD Jr., ROBERT (Mr.) | $4,393.74 | 7 | 04/11/2008 |
| 2 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $4,004.62 | 59 | 06/25/2011 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SALTGRASS STEAKHOUSE
Vendor ID 273192
|
2 | 100.0% | 75 | 2.7% |
|
CENTRAL MARKET
Vendor ID 56492
|
2 | 100.0% | 484 | 0.4% |
|
PIZZA HUT
Vendor ID 245404
|
2 | 100.0% | 564 | 0.4% |
|
JASON'S DELI
Vendor ID 162552
|
2 | 100.0% | 649 | 0.3% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
2 | 100.0% | 1,327 | 0.2% |
|
STAPLES
Vendor ID 294208
|
2 | 100.0% | 1,045 | 0.2% |
|
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
|
2 | 100.0% | 1,536 | 0.1% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
2 | 100.0% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
2 | 100.0% | 1,571 | 0.1% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
2 | 100.0% | 1,958 | 0.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/25/2011 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $90.10 | Fax line services for June |
| 06/03/2011 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $79.05 | Fax line services for May |
| 04/20/2011 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $78.55 | Fax line services for April |
| 03/14/2011 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $79.07 | Fax line services for March |
| 02/14/2011 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $162.16 | Fax line services for January and February |
| 12/28/2010 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $77.23 | Fax line services for December |
| 11/28/2010 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $81.94 | Fax line services for November |
| 10/28/2010 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $77.28 | Fax line services for October |
| 09/28/2010 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $77.37 | Fax line services for September |
| 08/28/2010 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $72.67 | Fax line service for August |
| 07/28/2010 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $72.67 | Fax line service for July |
| 07/02/2010 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $70.71 | Fax line service for June |
| 05/26/2010 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $70.77 | Campaign fax line service |
| 05/26/2010 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $70.77 | Campaign fax line service |
| 04/28/2010 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $145.53 | Campaign fax line service |
| 04/28/2010 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $145.53 | Campaign fax line service |
| 03/02/2010 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $77.20 | Campaign fax line service |
| 03/02/2010 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $77.20 | Campaign fax line service |
| 02/08/2010 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $68.35 | Campaign fax line service |
| 02/08/2010 | Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.) | $68.35 | Campaign fax line service |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.