Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

A BAdge and Button

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 3232 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$14,725.17
Client Filers
8
Payments
17
Activity Range
02/09/2012–12/19/2013
Largest Payment
$7,524.84
Graph: 8 connected filers · 17 payments · $14,725.17 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Stovall, Dwayne B. (Mr.)$14,001.00304/04/2012
2Texans for Dan Patrick$541.25410/22/2013
3Schofield, Mike$58.45210/22/2013
4Friends of Donna Campbell$51.96312/19/2013
5Friends of Paul Bettencourt$38.42211/18/2013
6Friends of Dan Huberty$11.37111/18/2013
7Friends of Jim Murphy$11.36111/18/2013
8Senter, Bob$11.36111/18/2013

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
RIGHT LISTS OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 264381
7 87.5% 47 14.6%
ABC Voter Contact
Vendor ID 4822
7 87.5% 49 14.0%
BISON SIGNS
Vendor ID 35481
7 87.5% 129 5.4%
Blakemore & Associates
Vendor ID 36318
7 87.5% 152 4.6%
PIRYX
Vendor ID 245154
7 87.5% 313 2.2%
MINUTEMAN PRESS
Vendor ID 214994
7 87.5% 377 1.9%
US POSTMASTER
Vendor ID 340396
7 87.5% 411 1.7%
FEDEX
Vendor ID 111488
7 87.5% 734 1.0%
KROGER
Vendor ID 181532
7 87.5% 785 0.9%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
7 87.5% 1,101 0.6%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
7 87.5% 1,571 0.4%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
7 87.5% 1,958 0.4%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
12/19/2013Friends of Donna Campbell$13.53Logoed Promotional Items
12/10/2013Friends of Donna Campbell$27.06Logoed Promotional Items
11/18/2013Friends of Donna Campbell$11.37Logoed Promotional Items
11/18/2013Friends of Dan Huberty$11.37Logoed Promotional Items
11/18/2013Senter, Bob$11.36Logoed Promotional Items
11/18/2013Friends of Paul Bettencourt$11.36Logoed Promotional Items
11/18/2013Friends of Jim Murphy$11.36Logoed Promotional Items
10/22/2013Schofield, Mike$17.86Logoed Promotional Items
10/22/2013Texans for Dan Patrick$13.53Logoed Promotional Items
10/10/2013Schofield, Mike$40.59Logoed Promotional Items
09/24/2013Friends of Paul Bettencourt$27.06Logoed Promotional Items
09/17/2013Texans for Dan Patrick$67.66Logoed Promotional Items
09/05/2013Texans for Dan Patrick$433.00Logoed Promotional Items
08/18/2013Texans for Dan Patrick$27.06Logoed Promotional Items
04/04/2012Stovall, Dwayne B. (Mr.)$568.31Palm cards
03/13/2012Stovall, Dwayne B. (Mr.)$7,524.84Signs and Palmcards
02/09/2012Stovall, Dwayne B. (Mr.)$5,907.85Signs and Palm Cards
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.