Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Search/859PRINT
Canonical Vendor

859PRINT

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 2882 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
View relationships →Reported names
Total Payments
$134,675.84
Client Filers
9
Payments
19
Activity Range
02/14/2026–06/16/2026
Largest Payment
$16,968.73
Graph: 9 connected filers · 19 payments · $134,675.84 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Montgomery County Conservative Alliance$35,818.06405/18/2026
2Panhandle Conservatives$27,966.72205/12/2026
3Rockwall County Conservatives$16,771.38305/26/2026
4Sweet Tea Patriots PAC$16,668.65306/16/2026
5Jefferson County United Republicans$16,099.32205/15/2026
6French, Bo (Mr.)$11,933.72102/23/2026
7Llano County Conservatives PAC$5,290.40205/13/2026
8Thorsen, Matthew Karl$3,300.00102/27/2026
9Bosque County Conservatives$827.59105/12/2026

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
HEIN STRATEGIES
Vendor ID 143418
 4 44.4% 16 19.0%
PROSPERITY BANK
Vendor ID 251273
 3 33.3% 218 1.3%
BO FRENCH CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 37669
 2 22.2% 16 8.7%
YOUNG REPUBLICANS OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 359612
 2 22.2% 19 7.7%
Digital Corporate Companies
Vendor ID 90705
 2 22.2% 30 5.4%
Texas Bank
Vendor ID 309741
 2 22.2% 34 4.9%
Meta Platforms
Vendor ID 210746
 2 22.2% 37 4.5%
PEERLY
Vendor ID 241268
 2 22.2% 60 3.0%
PRINTPLACE
Vendor ID 250332
 2 22.2% 68 2.7%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/16/2026Sweet Tea Patriots PAC$5,530.51Candidate slate mailer
05/26/2026Rockwall County Conservatives$1,728.35Campaign slate mailer
05/18/2026Montgomery County Conservative Alliance$6,283.11Candidate Slate Mailer
05/15/2026Jefferson County United Republicans$3,747.30Candidate Slate
05/13/2026Sweet Tea Patriots PAC$5,569.07Candidate Slate Mailer
05/13/2026Rockwall County Conservatives$4,000.00Candidate Slate
05/13/2026Llano County Conservatives PAC$1,305.69Slate Cards
05/12/2026Panhandle Conservatives$11,692.12Candidate Slate Mailer
05/12/2026Montgomery County Conservative Alliance$6,283.11Candidate Slate
05/12/2026Montgomery County Conservative Alliance$6,283.11Candidate Slate
05/12/2026Bosque County Conservatives$827.59Candidate Slate Mailer
02/27/2026Thorsen, Matthew Karl$3,300.00Mailer
02/23/2026French, Bo (Mr.)$11,933.72Mailer for Sweet Tea Patriots PAC
02/21/2026Rockwall County Conservatives$11,043.03Candidate slate
02/19/2026Montgomery County Conservative Alliance$16,968.73Candidate Slate
02/17/2026Llano County Conservatives PAC$3,984.71Slate Cards
02/16/2026Panhandle Conservatives$16,274.60Candidate Slate
02/14/2026Jefferson County United Republicans$12,352.02Candidate Slate
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.