Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

3D Screen Printing

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 1661 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$125,510.96
Client Filers
17
Payments
73
Activity Range
07/02/2014–02/19/2026
Largest Payment
$5,331.00
Graph: 17 connected filers · 73 payments · $125,510.96 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Uresti-Dasher, Lisa (Mrs.)$26,343.84912/16/2021
2Deputy Sheriff's Association of Bexar County Political Action Committee$20,311.84702/19/2026
3Diaz, Monique G (The Honorable)$19,467.581109/09/2022
4Reyes Jr., Raul (Mr.)$15,590.951205/13/2022
5Alvarez, Patricia O'Connell (The Honorable)$12,450.93711/02/2018
6Campos, Elizabeth (Ms.)$6,266.00707/10/2020
7Ramos, Jennifer V.$5,834.70302/10/2020
8Lopez, Gerald B. (Mr.)$4,167.63101/24/2022
9Uresti, Carlos I. (The Honorable)$4,122.25212/22/2015
10Farias, Katie$3,328.73208/12/2021
11Ellison, Lynn (The Honorable)$1,596.16110/19/2018
12Olivarri Jr., Ray J. (The Honorable)$1,458.00202/29/2016
13Cortez, Philip (Mr.)$1,136.50210/17/2015
14Uresti, Tomas (The Honorable)$918.05303/07/2018
15Lawson, Clinton F. (Mr.)$868.90210/23/2018
16Elizondo, Edna G. (Mrs.)$837.00107/02/2014
17Pena Rodriguez, Xochil (Mrs.)$811.90103/12/2020

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
12 70.6% 1,876 0.6%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
12 70.6% 3,017 0.4%
BEXAR COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 33267
11 64.7% 184 5.8%
PRESTIGE PRINTING
Vendor ID 249363
10 58.8% 187 5.2%
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
10 58.8% 1,669 0.6%
ALAMO MAILING
Vendor ID 9609
9 52.9% 79 10.3%
STARBUCKS
Vendor ID 294631
9 52.9% 690 1.3%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
9 52.9% 1,480 0.6%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
9 52.9% 1,536 0.6%
BILL MILLER BBQ
Vendor ID 34781
8 47.1% 68 10.4%
CIRCLE K
Vendor ID 63448
8 47.1% 361 2.2%
WHATABURGER
Vendor ID 352769
8 47.1% 541 1.5%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
02/19/2026Deputy Sheriff's Association of Bexar County Political Action Committee$746.93 Printing expense pro office holder
10/01/2025Deputy Sheriff's Association of Bexar County Political Action Committee$1,764.48 Sign Printing Expenditure
09/09/2022Diaz, Monique G (The Honorable)$2,376.094x8 Signs
05/13/2022Reyes Jr., Raul (Mr.)$433.00Signs
05/06/2022Reyes Jr., Raul (Mr.)$1,192.37Signs
05/02/2022Reyes Jr., Raul (Mr.)$263.00signs
04/21/2022Reyes Jr., Raul (Mr.)$629.21signs
04/07/2022Reyes Jr., Raul (Mr.)$1,991.80Signs
04/06/2022Reyes Jr., Raul (Mr.)$811.88signs
02/14/2022Reyes Jr., Raul (Mr.)$846.79Signs
01/31/2022Reyes Jr., Raul (Mr.)$1,163.69Signs
01/24/2022Lopez, Gerald B. (Mr.)$4,167.63Political Signs
01/18/2022Reyes Jr., Raul (Mr.)$1,028.38Signs
01/12/2022Reyes Jr., Raul (Mr.)$3,844.43Signs
12/31/2021Reyes Jr., Raul (Mr.)$3,250.00Signs
12/16/2021Uresti-Dasher, Lisa (Mrs.)$1,948.00print
11/10/2021Reyes Jr., Raul (Mr.)$136.40Signs
11/04/2021Uresti-Dasher, Lisa (Mrs.)$4,833.28print
10/24/2021Uresti-Dasher, Lisa (Mrs.)$2,000.00printing
08/12/2021Farias, Katie$622.48Sign printing sign labor
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.