Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Wildhorse Grill

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 354167 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$7,851.64
Client Filers
7
Payments
14
Activity Range
04/02/2006–06/13/2026
Largest Payment
$3,000.00
Graph: 7 connected filers · 14 payments · $7,851.64 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1King, Read (Mr.)$6,296.70704/18/2016
2Robison, Douglas (Mr.)$743.21102/29/2008
3Hays, Elaine Taylor (Mrs.)$303.03101/10/2024
4Fallon, Patrick (Mr.)$300.00209/24/2014
5Save Denton$140.11106/13/2026
6Stucky, Lynn D. (The Honorable)$52.52106/20/2017
7Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (Mr.)$16.07104/02/2006

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
DENTON COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 88779
6 85.7% 149 4.0%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
5 71.4% 1,174 0.4%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
5 71.4% 1,571 0.3%
BRIDGEPORT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Vendor ID 42438
4 57.1% 8 36.4%
RACETRAC
Vendor ID 253848
4 57.1% 125 3.1%
CHICK-FIL-A
Vendor ID 60264
4 57.1% 483 0.8%
SUBWAY
Vendor ID 299059
4 57.1% 469 0.8%
DOLLAR TREE
Vendor ID 92561
4 57.1% 578 0.7%
WHATABURGER
Vendor ID 352769
4 57.1% 541 0.7%
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Vendor ID 14178
4 57.1% 677 0.6%
FEDEX OFFICE
Vendor ID 111594
4 57.1% 649 0.6%
KROGER
Vendor ID 181532
4 57.1% 785 0.5%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/13/2026Save Denton$140.11 Lunch at event
06/20/2017Stucky, Lynn D. (The Honorable)$52.52Meeting with new president of local Republican club to discuss legislative issues
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.