Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
JOHN WRAY CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 168511 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$312,469.06
Client Filers
99
Payments
247
Activity Range
01/16/2014–09/23/2021
Largest Payment
$15,000.00
Graph: 99 connected filers · 247 payments · $312,469.06 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- John Wray Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
|
84 | 84.8% | 289 | 27.6% |
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
82 | 82.8% | 325 | 24.0% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
79 | 79.8% | 325 | 22.9% |
|
JOHN KUEMPEL CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 167958
|
76 | 76.8% | 220 | 31.3% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
75 | 75.8% | 524 | 13.7% |
|
TAN PARKER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 303857
|
74 | 74.7% | 273 | 24.8% |
|
RYAN GUILLEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 271542
|
73 | 73.7% | 253 | 26.2% |
|
JOHN RANEY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 168242
|
72 | 72.7% | 176 | 35.5% |
|
SARAH DAVIS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 276235
|
72 | 72.7% | 215 | 29.8% |
|
PHIL KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 243362
|
72 | 72.7% | 295 | 22.4% |
|
SENFRONIA THOMPSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 280021
|
71 | 71.7% | 268 | 24.0% |
|
CRAIG GOLDMAN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 78125
|
70 | 70.7% | 198 | 30.8% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/27/2018 | A Better Texas PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/27/2018 | Orrick Texas PAC | $500.00 | Contribution |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.