Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Farrell Gjesdal

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 110652 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$163,158.79
Client Filers
4
Payments
23
Activity Range
01/02/2020–03/24/2026
Largest Payment
$35,287.00
Graph: 4 connected filers · 23 payments · $163,158.79 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Kitzman Jr., Oliver S. (The Honorable)$147,276.091003/24/2026
2Brazos Values$10,219.15603/07/2025
3Republican Party of Brazos County (CEC)$4,500.00606/02/2020
4Hilburn, David G. (Mr.)$1,163.55112/31/2021

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
BCS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Vendor ID 29722
2 50.0% 14 12.5%
FARRELL GJESDAL STRATEGY GROUP
Vendor ID 110653
2 50.0% 21 8.7%
ANEDOT INC.
Vendor ID 16993
2 50.0% 168 1.2%
ANEDOT
Vendor ID 16982
2 50.0% 642 0.3%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
2 50.0% 3,017 0.1%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
03/07/2025Brazos Values$845.01Endorsement text
05/28/2024Brazos Values$611.70P2P texting supporting Maynard, Wharton, Nettles, Hince
01/18/2022Brazos Values$189.75P2P texting for 2021 city runoff election
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.