Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 57377 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$9,741.77
Client Filers
41
Payments
71
Activity Range
10/09/2002–09/22/2025
Largest Payment
$940.00
Graph: 41 connected filers · 71 payments · $9,741.77 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Toth, Steven H. (The Honorable)$1,652.00602/20/2024
2Seago, Ted (Dr.)$940.00101/19/2014
3Wiegman, Karen (Mrs.)$706.00408/04/2008
4Hope, Ruben$660.00601/09/2004
5Harrison County Republican Women$575.00512/15/2019
6Luna, Ryan A. (The Honorable)$519.00103/03/2025
7Republican Women of Van Zandt$400.00209/22/2025
8Robertson County Republican Women$375.00102/05/2025
9Rusk County Republican Women$350.00209/09/2019
10Republican Party of Brazos County (CEC)$325.00101/05/2019
11Democratic Women's Association of Lampasas$310.00803/13/2018
12Fort Bend Employee Federation Committee on Political Education$205.00111/19/2012
13Crownover, Myra$200.00209/21/2012
14Grimes County Republican Party$200.00212/14/2010
15Republican Women of Red River Valley$200.00108/19/2024
16Coryell County Republican Women$175.00104/05/2023
17Guadalupe County Republican Women$150.00105/03/2005
18Ridley, Hal R. (The Honorable)$150.00112/04/2019
19McCauley, Michael A. (Mr.)$150.00103/19/2024
20Smith, Steve$125.00111/20/2009

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
23 56.1% 1,876 1.2%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
18 43.9% 1,360 1.3%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
17 41.5% 3,017 0.6%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
16 39.0% 1,958 0.8%
HOBBY LOBBY
Vendor ID 147424
15 36.6% 946 1.5%
TEXAS FEDERATION OF REPUBLICAN WOMEN
Vendor ID 311375
14 34.1% 584 2.3%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
13 31.7% 1,327 1.0%
KROGER
Vendor ID 181532
12 29.3% 785 1.5%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
12 29.3% 1,480 0.8%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
12 29.3% 1,571 0.8%
TFRW
Vendor ID 315057
11 26.8% 259 3.8%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
11 26.8% 1,101 1.0%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
07/01/2023Live Oak County Democrats$50.00A membership for events of the democratic party. Expenditures cover over a year.
03/29/2016High Plains Republican Women PAC$115.00Membership Dues
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.